Martin Ritt's Conrack,
now available on Blu-ray from Twilight Time, first hit theaters in 1974. This was a time when new, brash directors
were reinventing American cinema, a time
when movie screens were likely spackled with vomit from demonically possessed
little girls, or blood from the victims of Dirty Harry Callahan's .44 Magnum. Theaters
in your neighborhood were just as likely to be playing hardcore porn as the
latest Paul Newman movie. Ritt's simple
tale of an optimistic white teacher in a schoolroom of dirt poor black students
was a success just by squeaking through to its birth.
Looking at it 40 years later, one is struck by two things,
namely, Jon Voight's relentless energy and goodwill as the big-hearted teacher,
and the very realistic performances from the kids. Even while acknowledging the film's uneven
tone, or what one critic deemed "a crazy quilt of naturalism, farce, and
soap opera all jumbled together," one is still intrigued by Conrack.
Maybe the idea that a caring soul might try to educate some people who
would otherwise remain ignorant strikes a primal cord within us. Maybe there's something irresistible about
sheltered folks suddenly realizing there is more to the world than their dirty
little backwater. Or maybe, and this
might trump all the other maybes, we all hated school so much that we wish our
own lives had been enriched, even briefly, by someone like Conrack.
Pat Conroy, a young idealist, takes a teaching position on a
remote island in a South Carolina river delta.
He's vowed to grow his hair until the war stops (the story takes place
in 1969) and the locals look at him as if they're seeing a mythical animal up
close, for a towering blonde white man on an island made up almost entirely of
blacks is as odd as a unicorn. The
locals can't even pronounce his name, which creates the movie's title. The newly dubbed Conrack fends off their
suspicions with a grin as wide as the Bible belt, and then sets about teaching
"the babies," as these fifth through eighth graders are called. He's shocked to find out the level of his
students' ignorance - they can't read, they know nothing about life beyond the
island, they've never heard of Babe Ruth or Halloween, have never played
football, and, Heaven forbid, they don't even know that coffee comes from
Brazil.
Based on Pat Conroy's memoir ‘The Water Is Wide,’ the story
follows Conrack's effort to help these children even as he is met by resistance
from the school's principal, a middle aged black woman (Madge Sinclair) who
believes the children need to beaten with a leather strap, and superintendent
Skeffington (Hume Cronyn), a grinning sadist who likes to grab a kid by the
thumb and twist, a punishing move he calls "milking the rat." Add to this a local drunk (Paul Winfield)
who skulks around the island like Boo Radley, the talkative Mr. Quickfellow
(Antonio Fargas) who stalks 13-year-old girls with promises of new dresses,
plus the natural reluctance of students who have never been challenged, and it
seems Conrack has entered a world that may be too much for him to conquer.
Yet, armed with nothing but his enthusiasm, Conrack
gradually earns the love and respect of the classroom. The kids, as meek as
church mice at the movie’s start, are
soon chanting James Brown songs, and dressed up for a Halloween trip to
Beaufort. Conrack's teaching methods are
unorthodox - he tickles, wrestles, and teases the students, and when he learns
that no one on the island knows how to swim, he promptly throws the kids, one
by one, into the river. His freewheeling style gets results. He even gets the
class to sit still long enough to listen to some recordings of classical
music.
I like how the kids calmly pay
attention to the sounds coming from the old turntable. In a more contemporary movie, they all would
have picked up instruments, mastered them overnight, and would have then gone on to win a contest
of some kind, for in modern America a story is only uplifting if you can crush
someone and win a prize. But in Conrack,
the kids merely listen; they’re quietly mystified by the music, happy that they
can come close to pronouncing the names of Beethoven or Brahms. Conrack even
picks up one of the younger boys and cradles him as the music plays, inviting
him to close his eyes and sleep.
Somehow, Conrack's good intentions get him labeled as "an outside
agitator" and fired from his job. Conrack tries to fight the verdict but
is no match for Skeffington’s power as superintendent. His good spirit bloodied
but unbowed, Conrack leaves the island. To the children he says, "May the
river be kind to you when you cross it."
As one might have expected, reactions to the movie were
mixed: syndicated columnist David Sterritt dismissed it as "an audacious
attempt at mythmaking." Indeed
there are scenes of Conrack jogging along the beach, his class running along
behind him, as if he’s some sort of golden haired pied piper, an image that probably
ruffled some feathers in the super cynical ‘70s. The New York Times gave it a
mostly positive review, but lamented the film's "glaze of sentimentality
that sugars much of the narrative."
Voight said at the time of the film's release that he had
some reservations about his own performance. "The guy comes over as sort
of self-congratulatory," Voight said in an interview with Roger Ebert. "The real Pat Conroy has a certain
cynical notion of himself; he didn't really think he was so
terrific." Indeed, Voight is a
whirlwind in the movie, spouting lines of poetry, pontificating on various
subjects, even babbling in Latin, which at times feels like an exercise by the
screenwriters determined to show us Conrack's intelligence and individualism.
(And do the children have any idea of what Conrack is saying when he goes on
these tangents?)
The movie occasionally feels undeveloped. For instance,
Conrack is supposed to be a reformed bigot. Now, somehow, he has become a happy
clown. He even befriends the local drunk
and teaches him to read. How did the change in Conrack come about? And is there
not a single residual ash of attitude left over from his redneck days?
The husband and wife screenwriting team of Irving Ravetch
and Harriet Frank adapted Conroy's memoir. The duo was known for such Southern
tinged films as Hud and The Reivers, and were Ritt's favorite
collaborators. Their interpretation of Conroy's story, though, was picked apart
by Conroy himself, who claimed they included things that had never happened.
Ritt defended this approach, saying that autobiographies aren't necessarily
cinematic, and that some creative tinkering was necessary. Yet, it was this mixing of the true and
fabricated that gave the movie what many critics judged a "shaky"
feel.
Yet, the movie's charms outweigh its flaws. Voight, enjoying the hot streak that began
with Midnight Cowboy and would last
the decade, acts up a storm. It's as if
he's Jimmy Stewart stepping out of a Capra film and into a Vittorio De Sica
slice of life epic. Cronyn is perfect as the cold-hearted Skeffington, a man
who can sweetly pet a rabbit while casually destroying a man's livelihood. The
21 kids in the classroom, locals chosen by Ritt for the movie, provide the
quiet heart and soul of the picture. I
can't imagine a more realistic group of children. The film is also intriguing
in that it upends practically every cinematic convention: a picture that could
be considered family viewing occasionally erupts in vulgar language; the
gradual uplift of the story ends on a bum note; there is absolutely not one
ounce of romance; and in perhaps the most audacious flaunting of an American
storytelling staple, the heroic underdog gets his ass stomped by the bad
guys.
Audiences didn't find the movie immediately. Conrack needed time to develop an
appreciative following of viewers who caught it on television over the years.
The movie has endured heavy criticism, though, particularly from those put off
by what they saw as the image of a benevolent white man bestowing his knowledge
on blacks. "I got a lot of flak on Conrack,"
Ritt said during an AFI interview in the 1980s. "A lot of flak. It pissed
me off, frankly." He added that the black community didn't "want to
know about white people who are doing good work," but that he wasn't going
to change his film to suit someone's political agenda. Ritt, unrelenting in his defense of Conrack, invited those who didn't like
it to make their own movie. A victim
of the McCarthy era communist witch-hunt, Ritt may have seen Conrack’s
dismissal from the school as a handy metaphor for the time he was blackballed
from Hollywood.
Conrack remains polarizing. Praise it, and you're accused of being mawkish.
Dismiss it, and you're accused of missing out on what is a very warm story,
what Ritt saw as “a love story between a white man and 21 black children."
Even the film's ending comes under fire. The children have gathered at the dock to bid
Conrack goodbye. Seeing that they're upset, Conrack starts firing questions at
them. Who was the first president? What state do we live in? The children
answer in unison. Maybe it's not a great example of education, maybe it's just
a sort of dog trick, with the kids responding to certain commands, but Conrack
has achieved something. He has cracked
open the minds of these children, perhaps just enough to let some light
in. He continues to fire questions,
creating the atmosphere of his schoolroom right there on the creaky old
dock. When a boat's engine can be heard
in the distance, we know his time is running out. When he gets onboard, one of the children
reveals the portable record player that was used in the classroom. She has cued
up one of the records Conrack would play for them: Beethoven's Fifth Symphony.
The bombastic music echoes across the river as Conrack fades away.
Many have complained about the scene, or scratched their
head in puzzlement. But I find it absolutely touching on two levels. The kids
know very little about music. They aren't aware of the bombast associated with
Beethoven. To them, this recording is just a “song” that Conrack likes, so they
play it as a kind of parting gift. Their
innocence is palpable. Yet, there's another level. Earlier in the movie,
Conrack explained to the children that Beethoven was thinking about death at
the time he wrote his fifth symphony. The opening cords of the piece, Beethoven
imagined, was what death would sound like when it came bashing at your door.
When the children play this recording, they could well be lamenting another
sort of death, the death of their education, the death of the 1960s, the death
of Conrack's dream of a new society.
They'd remembered something Conrack had told them about Beethoven and
death. In the midst of poverty and
hopelessness, this seemingly unimportant sharing of knowledge feels like a
small, glowing victory. That's why the
final moments of Conrack are as
moving as anything else that made it into theaters that year.
Or, for that matter, this year.
(The Twilight Time Blu-ray of Conrack was produced as a limited edition of 3,000 units. Extras
include a pamphlet about the movie with
an essay by Julie Kirgo , an audio
commentary from film historians Paul Seydor and Nick Redman, an isolated music
and effects track, and the original trailer.)
No comments:
Post a Comment