LOVE NOTES FROM A DIRTY OLD DRUNK
Get ready for a kinder, gentler Bukowski
By Don Stradley
Get ready for a kinder, gentler Bukowski
By Don Stradley
As a
poet, Charles Bukowski was prolific to the point of mania, and very uneven.
Reading Charles Bukowski On Love, an anthology from Ecco published a few
months back to coincide with Valentine’s Day, one feels that had Bukowski not
attained a reputation in Europe for his seedy subject matter, and in America
for the cult movie Barfly, he’d
barely rate a turn at your local poetry slam. Most of the early pieces here
sound mannered, with titles like ‘I Taste The Ashes of Your Death,’ and lines
like “you mean/a love I have not met/is
less than a selfishness I call near?” Later, as the collection inches into
Bukowski’s work of the 1970s, we get some of the more familiar tone, the
shit-stained panties, “cunt hairs in the teeth,” and the like. By that time, of
course, Bukowski had achieved a kind of fame and could write about farts if he
wished, and he often did, and editors happily printed his work, just to have
big bad Buk listed as a contributor.
With no
political leanings and no particular reverence for traditional poetic form,
Bukowski must’ve seemed like a relief from Viet Nam, Nixon, civil rights,
women’s liberation, and student upheavals. When his work began appearing in the
LA Free Press and various skin mags, even those who didn’t care for him had to
admit there was no one like him. His L.A. landscape, populated by vicious
whores and violent drunks, felt real, but was cartoonish enough to fit
alongside the underground comics and comedy albums of the day. As X-rated
material weaved into the mainstream, Bukowski imbued his poems and stories with
increasing frankness and humor. Soon, this writer who counted Céline
and John Fante as
influences was a favored court fool of the post hippie era. Rock stars and
political figures died away, but the nasty old drunk leering at the women lived
on, and on. Still, there were always moments in between the laughs and
vulgarity that smelled, not just of cheap wine and dirty socks, but actual poetry.
The
poems collected in Bukowski On Love
reflect only a fraction of his output and go nowhere towards a reassessment. The
arrangement is neat - cherry picked samples from each era of Bukowski’s career
pass by your eyes quickly. You'll get a few poems about his wives, his daughter, and a few about good old
Jane, the woman played, more or less, by Faye Dunaway in Barfly. Hell, there’s even a love poem about his favorite Olympia
typewriter, and a moving piece about a beloved harness driver whose “rhythmic
crazy rocking was transferred from man to beast…” There are also a few photos
of Bukowski looking teddy bearish and happy,
some of his illustrations (still bursting with primitive charm) and even
a reproduction of an actual Bukowski-typed manuscript, for those, I suppose, interested
in seeing his cross-outs (you’ll be amused to see that he misspelled “Los
Angeles”). Yet, there’s something about Charles Bukowski
On Love that makes it feel like a glorified stocking stuffer. Granted, if
RCA could mine Elvis Presley’s old albums for a series of clueless rehashes and
greatest hits packages, why can’t Ecco make a few more bucks off Bukowski the
same way? Ecco has already raided the
Bukowski archives to put out Bukowski On
Writing, and, get this, Bukowski On
Cats, all edited by a chap named Abel Debritto who, according to the book’s
flyleaf, “works in the digital humanities,” exactly the sort of high-blown
distinction that would’ve sent Bukowski puking.
If Ecco
is determined to break the man up into sections and resell him a bit at a time,
we might also expect such titles as Bukowski
on Drinking, Bukowski On Horses, Bukowski on Rape, and Bukowski on Death. This could go on well into the 2030s, or as long
as Ecco can squeeze a buck out of Buk. Is this method so bad, really? I don’t
know. What made Bukowski interesting was that he used to give it all to you at
once, the entire human comedy in one fat, hairy package, rather than parcel it
out one topic at a time. Perhaps it’s the neatness of Charles Bukowski on Love that irritates me, the anal quality of it all,
this feeling of Bukowski scrubbed clean.
Of
course, a few of the old favorites are here, including "Quiet Clean Girls in
Gingham Dresses," and "One for Old Snaggletooth," and perhaps the best poem of
his later years, "The Bluebird." One is still surprised when Bukowski puts
aside his gruff personae and shows an unexpected gentleness, such as this litany about life’s simplest pleasures:
“I like reading the Sunday papers
in bed
I like orange ribbons tied around
the cat’s neck
I like sleeping against a body
that I know well
I like black slips at the foot of
my bed
At 2 in the afternoon.”
Still, Charles Bukowski On Love feels flimsy. To present
nothing but Bukowski’s mushy side is akin to The Beatles without ‘Helter
Skelter,’ or Sugar Ray Robinson fighting with only his right hand. Missing is
the guy who wrote, “You boys can keep your virgins/give me hot old women in
high heels/ with asses that forgot to get old.”
That’s from "One of the Hottest," a good poem not included here, for
Debritto and Ecco wanted to create a quaint version of Bukowski, ignoring the man who, despite the seismic
changes going on in the country, focused solely on his own small existence
among the bums and the postal workers and the horse betters, the lonely and the
rotten, and wrote about whatever stuck to the windshield that day, which could
be anything from his suicidal fantasies, to the strange allure of little girls,
to the way ancient sorrows can well up in a man and stop him in his tracks, to
the vagaries of luck, to the joys of Beethoven and Brahms, and occasionally, to the
futility, and sometimes the quiet splendor, of love.
I just purchased "On Cats" and while basically a "glorified stocking stuffer" I found joy in it.
ReplyDeleteThat detail about digital humanities is a telling, though, and may explain how these books are produced. Digital humanities is an emerging discipline that uses new(ish) coding - like text mining in this case - to discover new patterns in literature. It's very possible that Debritto's contribution was writing code that returns a list of common words/themes from the Bukowski archive (sort of like a google search). Then, Debritto sorts through the results and compiles a collection.
This digital categorization may further send Bukowski puking. But expect to see more of it and the accompanying "end of literature" think pieces.